Easily and intuitively create all ArchiMate elements and relations in all of the ArchiMate views. Use the magic connector to create the right connections. Refine your model with user-defined properties, and colourise your diagram with your own colour scheme. Dynamic Viewpoints allow you to change your mind. You can experiment with different Viewpoints for the same View. And if you decide to keep the Viewpoint, you can simply remove any disallowed elements from the View.
Hints View Helping you understand ArchiMate. All ArchiMate elements, relationships and viewpoints are described to provide you with the right information at your fingertips, just when you need it. The Visualiser Connecting the dots. The Visualiser displays the selected model element and all of its relationships with other model elements in a radial-tree graphic.
Customers who bought this item also bought. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Jeanne W. Read more. Based on the authors' decades of practical experience in the field, Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: Provides step-by-step guidance to help organizations successfully introduce an enterprise architecture system Focuses on the processes to make enterprise architecture work Discusses ways to avoid bottlenecking in enterprise architecture Provides tips and best practices for implementing the processes involved Shows readers the most effective ways to use IT in their organizations Make the most out of enterprise architecture and achieve your business goals with the step-by-step guidelines found in Dynamic Enterprise Architecture.
Why Enterprise Architecture is Even More Relevant in a Hybrid IT World | chlortibiketa.cf
Don't have a Kindle? Share your thoughts with other customers.
- Enterprise Architecture Software Tool;
- Representations of the Rotation and Lorentz Grps and their Applns?
- Enterprise Architect for EU Institutions (m/f) - Job based in Luxembourg.
- Romes Enemies (5) The Desert Frontier.
Write a customer review. Showing of 2 reviews. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. Format: Hardcover. The title, Dynamic Enterprise Architecture, is very good idea, but I think I wasted time and money when I bought and read the book.
In chapter 4, the book described the Dyanmic Architecture model that made disappointed. I am architect, and have never heard any enterprise application was developed without architecture. The architecture is basically the solution of the enterprise computer system. I cannot image that system is developed without solution, because it will not work without architecture. First, the process is not useful.
- Continuous flow manufacturing : quality in design and processes!
- Dynamic Enterprise Architecture Models!
- Blues: Play 8 songs with tab and sound-alike CD tracks (Bass Play-Along Series).
- The Deleuze Connections?
I do not think any enterprise will do the same thing that so complicated and so complex, even they decided to use the Dynamic Architecture. Second, Some analysis and evaluation lack good grounds, such as the Finacial Analysis.
The cost is very important factor in the evaluation of the architecture. It depends on the hardware and software architectures. The book just gave a number of the cost, and the benefits. I cannot believe the numbers. Anyway, I think this is a good idea, and important topic of discussion, so I gave it two stars. There is no need to propose specific products or technical standards although this is possible. However, because of the influences of the contexts, services and functions can often be organization-specific.
Note that with the previously presented definition of infrastructure architecture, both the Blaauw "architecture" and "implementation" are subject to the infrastructure architect. Business, information and infrastructure architectures share a common goal: to provide optimum support for an organisation's operations. This is impossible without input from, and feedback between, the three architectural disciplines. To act effectively within the architectural process and at the same time be sufficiently responsive, each discipline must follow the dynamics and structures which underline their own respective area of competence.
This certainly applies to infrastructure architecture, which must make its role easily recognisable by clarifying the terms it uses within the infrastructure domain. The easiest way to do this is to describe infrastructure solutions in logical and functional terms. DYA Infrastructure defines the "capability" of a solution with a set of quality attributes. Quality attributes also have an important role in harmonizing the architectural process across the three architectural disciplines, because regardless of the underlying technological structure, quality attributes can be reconciled across the domains and be used throughout the entire solution.
“We don’t understand!”
At the same time, they also provide input for the engineering, creation and testing of solutions within their own area of competence. That is why quality attributes are a recurring theme throughout the different phases and activities of infrastructure architecture and why it is of the utmost importance to choose and define quality attributes carefully. At the very least, they must illustrate the unique and inherent quality of an infrastructure solution.
The architectural disciplines must be able to adjust to each other whenever necessary during the architectural process without compromising themselves.
Questions from the Audience
They should make clear what they can contribute and indicate their own limits. The full scope of wishes and requirements can not always be fulfilled; particularly if they even minimally conflict with each other. Should one of the disciplines want or need to dictate the eventual outcome, it should receive appropriate guidance from the architectural process, keeping in mind that the guidance must be relevant to the specific area of competence. The architectural process selects quality attributes most realistic and appropriate for the direction of the desired solution.
This set of quality attributes can be seen as a mandate for each discipline to individually work on their own part of the total solution. Quality attributes ensure the resulting solutions are not developed in isolation, but that they remain consistent within the complete architectural framework. Quality attributes also provide a way to check and report on delivered results. To stop disciplines talking at cross purposes, unequivocal agreement is needed on the quality attributes each discipline brings into the architectural process.
Archi – Open Source ArchiMate Modelling
These must serve as a basis for further reconciliation and harmonization of definitions within the architectural process. Infrastructure architecture provides its own set of quality attributes, alongside the specific quality attributes of the business and information architectures.
Apart from the quality attributes, there are two major restrictions that influence the potential direction of a solution, namely cost and time.
Related Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: How to Make It Work
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved